Advertise the clinic, not the cells.
Google bans stem cell and PRP promotion, and no certification unlocks it. What a regenerative clinic can advertise is everything else it does. Every rule below is quoted and dated.
5.0 on Google, 11 reviews
- 5.0 on Google, 11 reviews
Pelora Marketing does absolutely incredible work.
Melissa B., Google review- $5M+ad spend managed
- $15M+raised across his own companiesFounder Preston Durnford
For a regenerative clinic, a compliant ad sells the services Google never restricted, such as consults, diagnostics and physical medicine, and keeps stem cell, PRP and exosome therapy off the ad, the landing page and the booking menu behind it. Meta's policy does not name those therapies, but it bans cure claims for diseases like Parkinson's and ALS. FDA says no stem cell or exosome product is approved for orthopedic conditions.
- Consults
- Diagnostics
- Physical medicine
- Stem cell therapy
- PRP
- Exosome therapy

Five ways it goes wrong.
- PRP by any name. Google names PRP in its ban, no certification unlocks it, and a branded PRP procedure is still PRP.
- Knee pain. Stem cell, exosome, SVF, cord blood, Wharton's jelly and amniotic products alike: FDA says none of these products "have been approved for the treatment of any orthopedic condition, such as osteoarthritis, tendonitis, disc disease, tennis elbow, back pain, hip pain, knee pain."
- A disease list. The FTC's 2018 stem cell order bars claims that a product cures or treats Parkinson's, autism, multiple sclerosis and other conditions unless backed by competent and reliable scientific evidence.
- A seminar funnel. In January 2025, court orders banned the Stem Cell Institute of America's founders from marketing stem cell therapy. The FTC said they trained clinics to recruit through ads and free "educational seminars."
- Exosomes as a loophole. FDA: "There are currently no FDA-approved exosome products," and "as a general matter" exosomes used to treat diseases and conditions in humans are regulated as drugs and biological products.
What Google, Meta, FDA and the FTC say.
Each card quotes its source's own page, read on 26 September 2026.
Where each ad can run
Read at the source, 26 September 2026No certification needed. Google judges keywords one at a time.
No certification unlocks it. Google exempts only ads that are exclusively educational or informational, such as academic papers or medical conference tickets.
The same rules as Search, Display & Video 360 included.
The same ban, and the same educational exception.
18-plus as a health service, with no cure claims.
Not named in Meta's policy, and silence is not permission.
Describe the service as it is.
No approved stem cell or exosome product for orthopedic, neurological or heart conditions; cord blood cells for blood disorders are the approved exception.
Claims need competent and reliable scientific evidence.
Court orders, refunds and a marketing ban in FTC stem cell cases since 2018.
Not sure which of your services can run? We read the ad, the page and the booking menu before anything spends.
Book a CallFour surfaces, one verdict.
Each card says whether it is policy text or what we have seen in live clinic accounts.
How we find the line before spending real budget
In our published study the verdict could not be predicted from the policy text, so we submit a small test set first, from clearly safe to clearly restricted, and never promise a launch date before Google answers.
The policy's exception request is for FDA-licensed products, made by the entity that holds the license, alongside an ordinary appeal. We read it as written for manufacturers rather than clinics, and that is our reading.
Relief, described honestly.
On Meta, no copy may assume something about the viewer's body or health. The good line also names no regenerative product and promises no result, which is what FDA's letters and the FTC's orders turned on.
Both ads are illustrations, not a client's account.
Every regenerative post, read by a person.
Two rounds, by a person, before anything runs: every ad and the page one click away, read against Google, Meta, FDA and the FTC. Anything naming a prescription drug gets a drug-ad review, which is why a creator program for prescription products adds $1,000 a month.
- ClaimsNo heal, regenerate, repair, cure or "alternative to surgery."
- EvidenceAny outcome number shown with the study behind it.
- The pageOrganic pages can explain regenerative care; the ad's destination does not sell it.


Newport Beach office. Clients anywhere.
Platform rules are national, FDA and FTC rules are federal, and state medical boards add their own, so we check licensed states against geo-targeting first.
Asked by regenerative clinics.
Can a regenerative medicine clinic run programmatic or display ads?
Can a stem cell clinic advertise?
Can we advertise PRP on Google?
What about Meta ads for PRP or stem cells?
Can we buy stem cell leads from a lead generation company?
Do we need LegitScript for a regenerative clinic?
Do you work with regenerative clinics outside California?
Sources, all read on September 26, 2026: Google Ads, Speculative and experimental medical treatment, cell therapies, and gene therapies, Healthcare and medicines and Unauthorized pharmacies; Meta Transparency Center, Health and Wellness (change log Jul 22, 2026); FDA Consumer Alert on Regenerative Medicine Products (current as of April 9, 2024) and Public Safety Notification on Exosome Products; FTC releases of October 18, 2018 and January 8, 2025; PELORA Research Study 01 (September 23, 2026).
Get the account read first.
Fifteen minutes. Bring your service list and the ad that got rejected. We will tell you which services can run, where, and what stays organic.
5.0 on Google, 11 reviews
