The best regenerativemedicine marketingagencies for 2026

The rules that decide the account

Regenerative medicine is one of the few clinic categories where the marketing rules are written down by name (Google's healthcare policy page also sets out rules for addiction services, fertility and health insurance, among others), and most of the marketing is still sold as if they were not. Four bodies set them. We graded every agency on what it publishes about each, because what a firm is willing to put in writing is the best public proxy for how seriously it takes the problem. “Silent” below means does not publish on the pages we read, not does not know.

Google Ads. Google's healthcare policy lists, among what is not allowed, “Promotion of cell or gene therapies, subject to the exception below.” Its cell and gene therapy page names stem cell therapy and platelet rich plasma among its examples. The two exceptions, in Google's words: “In the United States, Google allows the promotion of FDA licensed or approved cell or gene therapies by entities that hold the relevant FDA license or approval to market that product.” and “Google allows ads for cell or gene therapies that are exclusively educational or informational in nature, regardless of regulatory approval status.” An agency selling you Google Ads for stem cell therapy owes you a sentence about which exception it is relying on.

Meta. Meta's Health and Wellness advertising standard does not name stem cell therapy. What it bars is the claim: “Claims (including those from health professionals or health organizations) to cure, heal, or eliminate” a named list of diseases; in ads for weight loss products and cosmetic procedures it also bars “statements of inferiority about physical appearance”, and it requires those ads, and ads for health products and services, to be “targeted to people at least 18 years or older”. The dated wording for both platforms, with the day we last read each page, is on our Health Ad Policy Tracker, and the rules for this category are summarised on our regenerative medicine ad rules page.

FDA. The FDA's consumer alert on regenerative medicine products says “Stem cell products are regulated by FDA, and, generally, all stem cell products require FDA approval.” and “There are currently no FDA-approved exosome products”. A marketing claim that a treatment is FDA-approved when it is not is the kind of statement the next body acts on.

FTC. In October 2018 the FTC settled with a California clinic over claims that amniotic stem cell therapy could treat Parkinson's disease, autism and macular degeneration; the order bars such claims “unless the claims are true and supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence” and “requires the defendants to notify current and former patients about the order within 30 days”. In August 2021 the FTC and the Georgia Attorney General sued the Stem Cell Institute of America, its co-founders and the clinic they ran; the defendants “charged up to $5,000 per joint injection”. In orders issued on 26 December 2024 and announced by the FTC on 8 January 2025, the defendants were left “banned from marketing stem cell therapy in the future”, and the orders require them to pay “$5,155,146 in both civil penalties and refunds” (the two co-founders and one of the companies, in the FTC's detail). That company trained chiropractors to market stem cell therapy. The marketing partner is part of the exposure.

How we built this list

We started from every agency we could find that publicly claims, on its own website, to serve regenerative medicine, stem cell or PRP clinics: the firms named on the two competing rankings, the firms that come up for the searches a clinic owner would run, and the firms already on our other agency lists. Twenty-one names. We read each one's own pages in a headless browser on 2 October 2026, kept the text, and graded only what is there; a second pass on 3 October read eighteen pages the first had missed (pricing or packages pages at Omnicore, Profit Zombies and Anytime, two further Profit Zombies pages, two posts at Target Patients MD, Gorilla's about page, blog index and six posts, Wellspring's locations page, a PatientGain examples page and a second try at Meros), a third pass after an independent check read three more (Gorilla's home and contact pages, with their structured data, and Regenerative Medicine Marketing's services page), and a fourth read six (Profit Zombies' and Inbound Medic's about pages, Inbound Medic's home page with its structured data, Anytime's case studies, Regenerative Medicine Marketing's stem cell page and Lifted Logic's team page), a fifth read three (Practice Growth Co's regenerative page, Inbound Medic's AEO post for regenerative medicine and R3's contact page), and a sixth read two (Wellspring's team page and its home page with its structured data), a seventh read Gorilla's regenerative medicine post and an eighth its guide to choosing an agency, both with their collapsed panels kept, and a ninth read Profit Zombies' two regenerative ad pages with the FAQ answers those pages hold in their structured data and show on a click. The first two passes had taken each page's visible text without opening collapsed panels, which is where Gorilla's prices, its FTC statement and its Meta statement, and Profit Zombies' Google and Meta statements, sit, so the later passes kept the full page text; the grades and the verifiable facts below include them all.

Eight did not survive. Klein New Media's own site names medical, healthcare and biotech clients but has no regenerative medicine page. First Page Sage and Focus Digital appear on a ranking of stem cell therapy SEO agencies that Focus Digital wrote and tops; neither site has a service page that names regenerative medicine, and First Page Sage's healthcare page does not mention it. k2md is a branding and advertising agency in Albuquerque with no regenerative claim; RNO1 is a branding and UX agency with none. Stethon Digital Marketing's site read “Coming Soon”. Meros Media's site served a bot check on both reads. US Lead Network's domain is listed for sale. Gorilla Marketing Experts nearly joined them, because its home page lists no regenerative service; its blog, read on the second pass, carries six stem cell posts, so it is in. Thirteen remained.

What we graded: what each agency publishes about Google's cell therapy rule, Meta's health rules, the FDA and the FTC (substantive means it states the rule or how it applies, including what the rule restricts (one named claim type or treatment counts, even in a single sentence); mentioned means it names the rule, the body or the risk without saying what is restricted, even without naming the platform; silent means nothing on the pages we read, and we did not read every page of every site), whether pricing is published, and what is verifiable about the company: founding year, location, named leadership, named clients. Where we write not published, we mean not on the pages we read. The order is a rule, not a judgment: the four grades summed (substantive two points, mentioned one, silent none), then whether a price is published, then what is verifiable about the company (a location, whether a city or a street address, a founding year, named leadership and a named client, one point each), then the name; an agency sits above another only when it leads on the first of those that differs. What we did not grade: results we cannot audit. Every number an agency reports about itself is labelled company-reported.

The honest headline: the rules are mostly unwritten

Of the thirteen agencies here, four state Google's cell therapy rule on their own sites, three mention platform restrictions without stating them, and six say nothing about it, including five that sell pay-per-click on Google. Nine say nothing about the FTC. Five say nothing about the FDA. And six publish a price: Gorilla Marketing Experts, Profit Zombies, PatientGain, Inbound Medic, Omnicore Agency and Anytime Digital Marketing; only one of the six, PatientGain, prices regenerative medicine itself, and the other five price a general service or a lead. The other seven publish nothing, which is the same unmet need we found on every other agency list we have written.

1. Gorilla Marketing Experts · Dallas, TX

Best for a clinic that wants Google Ads run under the educational exception by a firm that has written the rule and both exceptions down

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: substantive · Meta's health rules: substantive · FDA: substantive · FTC: substantive

Pricing: Published, as general starting prices in a FAQ panel on its home page: “Websites start at $2,500 as a one-time investment”; “Google Business Profile ranking starts at $99 per month, and AI ranking services start at $99 per month”; “Google Ads and Meta Ads management starts at $600 per month, plus your ad budget”; and “Most clients invest between $800 and $2,000 per month in total”. No regenerative medicine price; the about page says the firm was “founded in 2025 out of frustration with an industry that overcharges”.

Services: Web design, Google Ads, Facebook and Instagram ads, Google Maps SEO, AI search rankings.

What we verified: Founded in 2025; an address at “1920 Pacific Ave Ste 1008”, Dallas, on its contact page; “a team of 15 people” and “more than 30 businesses” are company-reported. Its blog carries six stem cell and regenerative medicine posts, and the Google Ads one states the rule more fully than any service page in this set: Google's policy, it says, “prohibits direct promotion of the following”, then stem cell therapy, cellular (non-stem) therapy, gene therapy, similar forms of regenerative medicine and platelet rich plasma; then “Two exceptions are written into the policy:” the educational one and the FDA-approved one, with the warning that “most MSC therapy protocols are not FDA-approved for the conditions being treated”. Its guide to choosing an agency says “Google and Meta restrict or outright prohibit direct advertising claims about stem cell treatments”, says in a collapsed panel that “Direct outcome claims about stem cell treatments, references to FDA approval for unapproved therapies, and language implying guaranteed results are either restricted or prohibited under Google's healthcare policies, Meta's advertising guidelines, and FTC substantiation requirements”, and names “FDA guidance on investigational treatment claims, FTC substantiation requirements for health and wellness content, and the specific advertising policies of Google, Meta, and other platforms”. Its regenerative medicine post states the FTC rule in a FAQ panel: “FTC rules require that all health claims be truthful and substantiated, and that patient testimonials include clear disclaimers when results are not typical”. On ownership: “Your website, ad accounts and Google Business Profile stay in your name, always.”

Where it may not fit: The stem cell writing is six blog posts, not a service page: its home page lists “Clinics, dentists, med spas, mental health and wellness practices” and the about page says its clients are “most of them home service companies and medical spas”. Founded in 2025; its named case study is a courier (“Courier Service NY”), and the only stem cell client on its pages is a reviewer's quote on the home page (“They understand the stem cell space deeply. Our clinic is fully booked now.”, signed Sofia Reyes, company-published), not a named clinic or a case study; no named founder on the pages read; its prices are general, with no regenerative medicine figure.

Visit Gorilla Marketing Experts →

2. Target Patients MD · New York, NY, and Austin, TX

Best for a clinic that wants the agency to have already written down how it handles FDA, FTC and platform rules

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: substantive · Meta's health rules: substantive · FDA: substantive · FTC: substantive

Pricing: Not published.

Services: SEO and Google Business Profile, Google Ads and paid social, educational content and video, generative-engine optimization, websites, reporting.

What we verified: Describes itself as a “healthcare-exclusive digital marketing agency serving medical and dental practices across the United States and Canada”; addresses in New York (“1178 Broadway, 3rd Floor #1421”) and Austin on its contact page; CEO Steve Bunker is named on its home page. Its regenerative medicine page is the most specific compliance writing on a service page in this set: “FDA guidelines restrict specific outcome claims, and both Google and Meta have their own overlapping ad policies that flag regenerative treatment language faster than you'd expect”, followed by a table of wording to replace, in which “FDA-approved stem cell treatment” is called “either factually inaccurate or unsubstantiated under current regulatory standards”, and the advice to “Keep your ad destination page separate from your main treatment pages”. It recommends “Condition-based creative” over ads that lead with the treatment name. Its case studies name Park Avenue LASEK, Bela Vida Med Spa and Sight Of Beauty Med Spa. Two of its blog posts take on the FTC: “Under FTC Act Section 5, any testimonial or outcome statement you publish must represent typical patient results”, and the FTC “requiring that any health claim in your marketing be substantiated by credible scientific evidence”. Already on our GLP-1 agency list, at number ten.

Where it may not fit: Regenerative medicine is one of sixteen specialties in its navigation, its home page says “We specialize in Medical Spas, Dental, Ophthalmology, and Plastic Surgery patient acquisition”, the results it publishes are for other specialties (LASEK, laser hair removal, CoolSculpting), and the FTC appears on its blog, not on the regenerative page itself. No price.

Visit Target Patients MD →

3. Profit Zombies · Tampa, FL

Best for a clinic that wants one vendor for ads, website, SEO and follow-up, sells exosome programs, and would rather pay per lead

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: substantive · Meta's health rules: substantive · FDA: substantive · FTC: silent

Pricing: Published, per lead: “$50-100/lead” for a lead with a verified phone number and “$150-200/lead” for one that has also booked, on its pay-per-lead page, with the ad spend paid by the clinic (“starting at $2,000/month”) and “NO RETAINERS”. Its managed-service fees are not published; the regenerative page quotes other people's procedure prices, not its own.

Services: Google and social ads, websites, SEO, lead generation and follow-up, a pay-per-lead option.

What we verified: Tampa, Florida on its contact page (a city, no street address); its about page says “FOUNDED 2020”; its home page names clients with case studies (Villages Health Center, PUR Life Medical, IR Wellness, Perrault Chiropractic). Its regenerative page separates exosomes from PRP on regulatory grounds, as Gorilla Marketing Experts' Google Ads post also does: “Exosome therapy marketing operates under sharper regulatory scrutiny than PRP, with FDA warning letters targeting exosome claims”. Its FAQ answers whether PRP advertising is easier: “Yes, comparatively. PRP's use of the patient's own blood puts it in a lighter claim-scrutiny zone, while exosomes draw active FDA attention”. Its Google Ads page for the category says “Regenerative medicine sits squarely inside Google's health-content policies” and its social ads page that “Meta's health-content policies restrict the same claims the FDA watches”.

Where it may not fit: It says “We work exclusively with regenerative medicine clinics and practices like yours” on a site that also sells itself to chiropractors, dentists, orthodontists, med spas, aesthetic practices and plastic surgeons. Its two regenerative ad pages state what each platform restricts, in collapsed FAQ panels: “Google restricts speculative and unproven medical claims, and regenerative therapies sit directly in that zone” and “Meta restricts unproven health claims, so creative built on education and provider credibility stays compliant while hype-led creative gets rejected or gets the account flagged”, nothing on the FTC, no named leadership on the pages read, and the only published price is per lead.

Visit Profit Zombies →

4. PatientGain · city not published on the pages read

Best for a clinic that wants a published monthly price and a plain statement of Google's rule before the first call

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: substantive · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: substantive · FTC: mentioned

Pricing: Published: “Pricing $1699/mon to $2499/mon” for regenerative practices, on the page's heading; the same page's title says “Regenerative Medicine Marketing Services $1999/mon”. A competing ranking quotes a lower range for it; the page itself says these.

Services: A HIPAA-compliant website, a leads-funnel CRM, texting and chat apps, SEO, Google Ads, social posting, email and SMS, reputation, all under a business associate agreement; a platform with people, not a studio.

What we verified: States Google's rule in its own words on the service page itself: “Google PPC has strict policies against advertising for most stem cell therapies”, then the FDA-licence exception and Google's line that educational ads must be “exclusively educational or informational in nature”. It has a section headed “FDA-Compliant Marketing & Advertising Strategies” (“Regenerative medicine advertising must follow strict guidelines to avoid misleading claims”, with the example of a clinic that avoids promising a cure), says its approach involves “ensuring compliance with FDA guidelines and medical advertising regulations”, and its list of what it does includes “Ensure compliance with FDA and FTC regulations in advertising.”

Where it may not fit: Its dental page reads “Typically $899/mon to $2499/mon”; the price is a platform rate that varies by specialty. The regenerative page's own example copy includes a patient quote, “After one stem cell treatment, my mobility improved!”, and “Before-and-after images of patients with improved mobility”, which a clinic would have to substantiate (see the FTC orders above). Nothing on Meta's rules; the FTC is named once, in a list; no city on the pages read.

Visit PatientGain →

5. Practice Growth Co · city not published

Best for a clinic that wants a compliance review built into the engagement and reporting on booked consults

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: mentioned · Meta's health rules: mentioned · FDA: substantive · FTC: mentioned

Pricing: Not published.

Services: Google Ads, SEO, Meta Ads, AI search, landing pages, conversion optimization, and a “Compliance Review” in which “Claims, before/after creative, and ad copy reviewed against specialty advertising norms”.

What we verified: Founder Mike Funkhouser is named; the about page states “10+ YEARS IN HEALTHCARE MARKETING”, “95+ SPECIALTY PRACTICES” and “$140M+ PATIENT REVENUE INFLUENCED”, all company-reported; its reviews name two client organisations (“GUIDING LIGHT COUNSELING CENTER”, “BREATHE BETTER INSTITUTE”). Names the FDA, the FTC and the ad platforms in one sentence of its own ranking of regenerative agencies: “the FDA and FTC police claims aggressively, ad platforms restrict the category” (no Google or Meta rule is named on the pages we read; the platforms' restrictions count as mentioned under the standard above). Its regenerative page states the FDA rule: “FDA guidelines prohibit specific efficacy claims for many regenerative treatments”, and under what is not allowed, “claims that treatments cure specific diseases or conditions without FDA approval”. Bids “by consult value, not click volume”. Already on our GLP-1 agency list, at number three.

Where it may not fit: Mentions the ad platforms' restrictions and the FTC without naming or stating a Google or Meta rule; the FDA rule is the one it states. Regenerative medicine is one of six specialties in its footer. That ranking places Practice Growth Co first. No city on the pages read; no price.

Visit Practice Growth Co →

6. Wellspring Digital · Frederick, MD, with offices in Taylor, TX, Naples, FL, and Orlando, FL

Best for a practice that wants a full-service team with four offices in three states and a fractional CMO option

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: mentioned · Meta's health rules: mentioned · FDA: mentioned · FTC: silent

Pricing: Not published.

Services: SEO, Google Search Ads, web design, marketing automation, content, social, vCMO.

What we verified: Founder and CEO Karl Hindle is named, and its team page says “Karl Hindle founded Wellspring Digital in January 2017” (its home page's structured data says the same; the footer copyright reads “© 2016-2026”); the site is “certified by Google in both Analytics and AdWords”; four offices on its locations page; eight named client organisations, each with a named signatory, on its home page (Lincoln Healthcare Leadership, FITCI and Omeza among them). Its regenerative page acknowledges “treatments which are not considered as mainstream or have full FDA approval”, says campaigns for these practices are “impossible without deep knowledge of different channels' rules and best practices regarding the healthcare industry”, and warns that “you must fully comply with numerous requirements”.

Where it may not fit: “the Go To choice for regenerative medicine marketing in the country and around the world” is a superlative with nothing behind it on the page. The requirements and the channel rules it mentions are never named, Google Search Ads is sold without a word on Google's cell therapy rule by name, and there is no regenerative case study. No price.

Visit Wellspring Digital →

7. Inbound Medic · New York, NY

Best for a clinic that wants to be found in ChatGPT and Perplexity, runs no ads, and will pay a published $10,000 a month for two years

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: silent · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: substantive · FTC: silent

Pricing: Published: “$10,000 per month. 24-month build.” on its home page, with a 66-month revenue model beside it.

Services: Schema and content structured for retrieval by AI assistants, an embedded GPT that answers patients' questions, websites; no paid media.

What we verified: Address at “41 Madison Avenue”, New York; copyright “© 2017 - 2025”. Its regenerative page is a post by Dev Chatterjee dated January 3, 2025, and its about page says “I am the Founder of Inbound Medic” (Dev); its home page's structured data gives a founding date of 2017 and the page names a client, Dr. Kate Brayman. A sibling post on AEO for regenerative medicine says a ChatGPT answer “must balance scientific accuracy with FDA compliance requirements” and describes content built to be discoverable “while maintaining FDA compliance requirements” by “avoiding unsubstantiated medical claims”, which names the body and a claim type, so its FDA cell is substantive. One of six agencies here that publish a price.

Where it may not fit: “Agencies can't help” and the rest of the post are positions, not evidence; the revenue model assumes three to four new patients a month at $10,000 each; the client result on its home page is a dental practice; the regenerative post itself addresses neither the FTC nor any platform rule, and on it the FDA appears only as a patient's question (“Is this FDA-approved?”); the FDA sentence that earns its grade is on a sibling post, not on the service page.

Visit Inbound Medic →

8. Think Bullish · West Palm Beach, FL

Best for a practice that wants a guarantee in writing and will read its terms

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: mentioned · Meta's health rules: mentioned · FDA: silent · FTC: silent

Pricing: Not published. The offer is “100 new patients guaranteed or you don't pay”, “under the agreed patient-acquisition program terms”, which are not on the page.

Services: Paid media on Google, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, an AI front desk that answers inquiries, websites and funnels, medical SEO, answer-engine optimization.

What we verified: “Since 2017, Think Bullish has been the trusted partner” for medical practices; “West Palm Beach, Florida 33407” on its about page; founder Zack Siegel started with his father's practice; “441+ PRACTICES IMPLEMENTED”, “$9.1M+ AD SPEND MANAGED” and “91% AVERAGE RETENTION” are company-reported. Its regenerative page says the marketing should “use careful claims” and lists “compliant paid-media review” among what a program should include; one practice per area; its regenerative page carries named client results (Medical Center Plus, Blue Mountain Wellness, Fairwood Health, Novis Health). Already on our TRT and men's health agency list, at number ten.

Where it may not fit: The compliance language names no platform and no regulator. The headline results (“$46k → $100k/mo” “in 8 months”) carry no modality and are company-reported. No price.

Visit Think Bullish →

9. R3 Stem Cell Marketing · Scottsdale, AZ

Best for a clinic that wants a physician-run marketer that takes one client per area

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: silent · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: mentioned · FTC: silent

Pricing: Not published.

Services: Websites and content, “PAY PER CLICK ON GOOGLE/BING/YAHOO”, Facebook advertising, video, and IRB-approved studies a practice can join.

What we verified: Founded by David Greene, MD, MBA; “32531 N Scottsdale Ste 105-559”, Scottsdale, on its contact page; “Only one client is taken on per area”; named clients on its home page (Freedom Healthcare Centers, Atlas Medical Center, Novita Spa). Its own disclaimer reads “Stem cell therapy is considered experimental and is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but it is not FDA-approved.”

Where it may not fit: Its home page says “over 20,000 cases generated” and its about page “OVER 15,000 Stem Cell Cases in Seven Years”, both company-reported. It sells pay per click on Google for stem cell therapy and says nothing about the Google rule that names stem cell therapy as not allowed. Its about page says “The methods developed led to the formation of US Lead Network”; that company's domain is listed for sale. No price.

Visit R3 Stem Cell Marketing →

10. Omnicore Agency · Tampa, FL

Best for a clinic that wants a long-established healthcare agency with a dedicated stem cell page and published starting prices

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: silent · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: silent · FTC: silent

Pricing: Published, as starting points: “Starts from $1500*” for SEO, “Starts from $2000*” for paid search and for paid social, “Starts from $5000*” for web design, on its pricing page, each footnoted “services and pricing are customized based on your practice's needs”. Not specific to regenerative medicine; its FAQ on investment says “you only pay for what you use”.

Services: SEO, paid search, paid social, websites.

What we verified: “In 2009, Omnicore began as The SEO Compass”; founder Dr. Hafiz Muhammad Ali is named (“Founder & Ex-CEO”); Tampa address; named clients on its home page (Nepenthe Wellness Center, Boca Raton Aesthetics, Nordic Med Spa), two of them with a named signatory (Nordic Med Spa's owner, Nepenthe's managing director). A dedicated stem cell therapy clinic page naming PRP and stem cell injections.

Where it may not fit: The stem cell page mentions HIPAA and nothing else: no FDA, no FTC, no platform rule. The published results are for med spas and a wellness center (“With an ad spend of $426.71, we generated 37 qualified leads using Facebook ads”), not regenerative clinics. The prices are general starting points, not a regenerative quote.

Visit Omnicore Agency →

11. Anytime Digital Marketing · Dallas, TX, with Houston and Miami offices

Best for a clinic that wants a general digital agency with a regenerative page, a Texas office and package prices

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: silent · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: silent · FTC: silent

Pricing: Published, as packages: “KICKSTART BUNDLE $350 Per Month**” to “GROWTH BUNDLE $750 Per Month**”, and PPC management at “$500 per month” for ad spend up to $5,000 a month, on its packages page. Its regenerative page's form asks which band you are comfortable with, from “$750-$1,500/month” to “$5,000+/month”; the packages are for any business, not a regenerative quote.

Services: Website design, social, SEO, PPC, display, local SEO, email, reputation, video, streaming TV and audio ads.

What we verified: “Anytime Digital Marketing was established in 2014”; a Dallas address with Houston and Miami offices on its contact page; its case studies page names six clients (Bonita Dental, Amtex Insurance, Spirit Adornments, SHSU Online, Blo Dry Bar, Martini Blu) and its packages page carries reviews from two dental practices; none is a regenerative clinic.

Where it may not fit: The regenerative page is a market-size statistic and a service list; nothing on the FDA, the FTC or any platform rule; no named regenerative client; no named leadership on the pages read; the prices are package prices for any business.

Visit Anytime Digital Marketing →

12. Lifted Logic · Overland Park, KS

Best for a clinic whose first need is the website, on HIPAA-compliant hosting

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: silent · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: silent · FTC: silent

Pricing: Not published.

Services: Branding, consulting, PPC and Google Ads, SEO, AI search, web design and development, “HIPAA Compliant Hosting”, a treatment planning tool.

What we verified: Address at “5600 W 95th St”, Overland Park. Its regenerative page says “Lifted Logic partners with regenerative medicine practices to create digital experiences that educate, inspire confidence, and support steady growth”. Named case studies with company-reported figures, for two med spas and a plastic surgery practice; the company's team page names “Adam Fichman” as “Owner & Founder” and its structured data says “Since 2007, Lifted Logic has built thousands of successful websites”.

Where it may not fit: The regenerative page is about design and messaging (“you're guaranteed to stand out”) and says nothing about claims rules. The aggregate figures (“1.5 M Leads generated”, “$1 B Revenue generated”) are company-reported across all clients. No regenerative client named; no price.

Visit Lifted Logic →

13. Regenerative Medicine Marketing · Raleigh, NC

Best for a clinic that wants a small shop that does nothing but regenerative medicine marketing

Rules published: Google's cell therapy rule: silent · Meta's health rules: silent · FDA: silent · FTC: silent

Pricing: Not published.

Services: SEO, websites, content, patient acquisition, and paid ads: “We specialize in Google Ads and Facebook Ads”, on its services page.

What we verified: “A Division of Edge Digital, Inc.”, with a Raleigh address; “over 20 years of digital marketing expertise” and “successfully ranked multiple stem cell startups”, company-reported; its stem cell page says “Since 2019, we have specialized in partnering with healthcare providers and medical spa practices” (a specialism date, not a founding year). The whole site is about regenerative practices: “Our team is LASER FOCUSED on Patient Acquisition”.

Where it may not fit: No named leadership, no named client, no price, nothing on the rules (it sells Google Ads for regenerative practices without a word on Google's cell therapy rule), and a promise that “We will show you how you can get more patients in your waiting room in one month”.

Visit Regenerative Medicine Marketing →

How to actually choose one

Ignore the rankings, including this one, and run four checks instead.

Ask them to state the rule. Google's cell therapy policy and its two exceptions, unprompted. Four of the thirteen have written Google's rule for the category down, two of them with the exceptions; the rest should be able to say it on the call. If the answer is that they have never had a problem, the account has not been reviewed yet.

Ask what evidence file sits behind each claim. The FTC's 2018 order against a stem cell clinic bars its health claims “unless the claims are true and supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence”, and the orders it announced in January 2025 banned a marketer, not only a clinic. An agency that writes cure or FDA-approved into your ads is writing your exposure.

Ask for the number first. Six agencies here publish one, one of them for regenerative medicine. Ask the other seven in the first email, and ask whether ad spend is separate.

Ask who owns the accounts. Your ad account, your website, your domain, your CRM data. If leaving means rebuilding from scratch, that is not a partnership. Our account ownership guide shows how to check each one today.

Questions regenerative medicine clinic owners ask